Industry concentration in common value auctions: theory and evidence
نویسنده
چکیده
We examine theoretically and experimentally two countervailing effects of industry concentration in common value auctions. Greater concentration of information among fewer bidders reduces competition but increases the precision of private estimates. We demonstrate that this generally leads to more aggressive bidding. However, the reduction in competition dominates the informational effects, resulting in lower prices. We examine these hypothesized effects experimentally by conducting a series of auctions with constant informational content but distributed among a varying number of bidders. The experimental results are consistent with our theoretical predictions.
منابع مشابه
A Comparative Study of Multi-Attribute Continuous Double Auction Mechanisms
Auctions have been as a competitive method of buying and selling valuable or rare items for a long time. Single-sided auctions in which participants negotiate on a single attribute (e.g. price) are very popular. Double auctions and negotiation on multiple attributes create more advantages compared to single-sided and single-attribute auctions. Nonetheless, this adds the complexity of the auctio...
متن کاملHow to Eliminate Collusion in Tenders and Auctions, using Game Theory (Determination of Ceiling and Floor Prices)
Governments and firms in accordance to their duties, obliged to inevitably contracts with Individuals and legal entities, especially in auction and tender process. Since, the law of conducting tenders and auctions is lacking efficiency and has major objection, therefore, this has led to the dissemination and development of areas of corruption in these contracts (through collusion). In this pape...
متن کاملComparative Static Effects of Number of Bidders and Public Information on Behavior in Second-Price Common Value Auctions
,Abstract: Comparative static tests of Nash bidding theory in second-price common value auctions show that bidders fail to respond in the right direction to more rivals and to public infonnation concerning the value of the item. The fonner provides a clear indication that bidders fail to appreciate the adverse selection forces inherent in common value auctions. while the latte( shows that polic...
متن کاملLevel-k Auctions: Can a Non-Equilibrium Model of Strategic Thinking Explain the Winner's Curse and Overbidding in Private-Value Auctions?
This paper proposes a structural non-equilibrium model of initial responses to incompleteinformation games based on "level-k" thinking, which describes behavior in many experiments with complete-information games. We derive the model's implications in firstand second-price auctions with general information structures, compare them to equilibrium and Eyster and Rabin's (2005) "cursed equilibrium...
متن کاملCommon Value Auctions with Voluntary and Qualified Entry
We study auctions under different entry rules. Existing evidence about common value auctions points toward a severe overbidding phenomenon (winner’s curse) and high bankruptcy rate. In an experiment, we show that voluntary entry makes winner’s curse bids and bankruptcies more frequent, compared to a treatment with random assignment to the auctions. Instead, bankruptcy rates decrease when bidder...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2003